<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Sean Michael Kerner</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2008-01-08:/skerner/21</id>
<updated>2009-11-06T16:51:04Z</updated>
<subtitle>Netstat -vat - A command line view of IT.
</subtitle>
<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.25</generator>

<entry>
<title>Google&apos;s Chrome browser updated for security fixes</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/googles-chrome-browser-updated.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59135</id>

<published>2009-11-06T16:09:39Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-06T16:51:04Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Auto-Update&apos; files:Google is updating the stable version of its Chrome browser to version 3.0.195.32.The new release fixes two security issues and addresses a number of stability issues including a top crash condition and a bug that could...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Auto-Update&apos; files:Google is updating the stable version of its Chrome browser to version 3.0.195.32.The new release fixes two security issues and addresses a number of stability issues including a top crash condition and a bug that could...
<![CDATA[<br />The flaw stems from Chrome's setInterval JavaScript function usage.<br /><blockquote><b>"I
think the root cause of this is also behind lots of the various 100
percent CPU reports seen on various sites (gmail, nytimes, etc) since
it's very easy to leak a setInterval()," A Google developer wrote in
the bug <a href="editor-content.html?cs=utf-8">report</a>.

<br /></b></blockquote>That's a pretty serious flaw and it affected major
websites including Google's own Gmail. I always wondered why Gmail
behaved so erratically on Chrome and now I know.<br /><br />As opposed to
every other major browser vendor, Google has an automated update
process for its users. As such existing Chrome users will automatically
be updated to the 3.0.195.32 version without the need to click on their
own to visit Google for an update.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Mozilla updates Firefox 3.5.5 for &apos;annoying&apos; bug</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/mozilla-update-firefox-355-for.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59134</id>

<published>2009-11-06T15:11:04Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-06T16:08:04Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Quick Fix&apos; files:For the most part, Mozilla issues updates to its open source Firefox browser for both security and stability related issues. That&apos;s not the case with the new 3.5.5 update out today.Firefox 3.5.5 has no listed...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Quick Fix&apos; files:For the most part, Mozilla issues updates to its open source Firefox browser for both security and stability related issues. That&apos;s not the case with the new 3.5.5 update out today.Firefox 3.5.5 has no listed...
<![CDATA[<br />Aha! So that's why I didn't notice any 'big' issues with Firefox 3.5.4
myself, I run Linux and wasn't (personally) affected by the GIF flaw.
Seeing as GIFs are pervasive across the web, this can be one very
annoying flaw that could potentially have triggered frequent crashes of
Firefox.<br /><br />The other two critical fixes are also crash related items, one of which is a&nbsp; startup crash related to font handling.<br /><br />No these are not major security issues but an annoying issues like these that
negatively impact user experience is something that needs to be
addressed rapidly - which is precisely what Mozilla has done.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Google brings Closure to open source JavaScript devs</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/google-bring-closure-to-open-s.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59131</id>

<published>2009-11-05T21:13:23Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-05T21:50:36Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Open Source Development&apos; files:Google builds a lot of its own tools as part of its development efforts. Sometimes we get all &apos;get lucky&apos; and the tools become open source and available too.That&apos;s what has happened today with...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Open Source Development&apos; files:Google builds a lot of its own tools as part of its development efforts. Sometimes we get all &apos;get lucky&apos; and the tools become open source and available too.That&apos;s what has happened today with...
<![CDATA[<br />In addition to the compiler, Google has also open sourced Closure
Templates, a Closure Library and a Closure Inspector.&nbsp; The tools all
have the common goal of improving JavaScript.<br /><br />Another
interesting factoid about this whole effort is that Closure was not an
official Google effort at first, but rather came out of Google
engineers own 20 percent time (time that Google let's people work on
their own projects).<br /><br />Those pet projects are now used by Google in its own infrastructure and starting today available to anyone.<br /><blockquote><b>"Today, each Closure Tool has grown to be a key part of the JavaScript
infrastructure behind web apps at Google," the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="byline-author">Closure Tools team wrote in a blog post."</span> That's why we're
particularly excited (and humbled) to open source them to encourage and
support web development outside Google."</b></blockquote>]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Cisco&apos;s Chambers &amp; EMC&apos;s Tucci: Buddies in Bad Times</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/ciscos-chambers-and-emcs-tucci.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59119</id>

<published>2009-11-05T15:24:51Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-05T19:05:28Z</updated>

<summary><![CDATA[From the 'Former Wang Employees'&nbsp; files:Sometimes is not what you know that's important, it's who you know -- right?This week, Cisco, EMC and VMware entered into a partnership for delivering integrated virtual data center solutions. Aside from the news itself,...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
<![CDATA[From the 'Former Wang Employees'&nbsp; files:Sometimes is not what you know that's important, it's who you know -- right?This week, Cisco, EMC and VMware entered into a partnership for delivering integrated virtual data center solutions. Aside from the news itself,...]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote><b>"I trust Joe with my life," Chambers said.<br /></b></blockquote>Trust
is a key component of the new Cisco/EMC/VMware partnership, for both
the partners involves as well as for customers. All parties need to
trust each other to do the right thing to get the best solution. <br /><br />Cisco
and EMC both have plenty of other partners, and in a limited way also
have some overlapping solution and service sets. To actually get a 'one
throat to choke' from the vendors that will be responsible for a joint
solution is a big deal and in my view will be the real proof point for
the success (<i>or failure</i>) of the new venture.<br /><br />But why didn't Cisco just try and buy EMC? Or merge with them? Wouldn't that be an option?<br /><br />During
Cisco's first quarter fiscal 2010 earnings call, Chambers explained his
strategy for when it makes sense to buy, build or partner.<br /><blockquote><b>"General rule of thumb, partner big to big, acquire big to small," Chambers said</b>.<br /></blockquote>It's
an idea that makes a lot of sense, as Chambers wants and need to be in
control. If the general friendship between Tucci and Chambers did not
exist, the partnership might still exist, but it just would seem as
honest, would it?]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Adobe updates Shockwave for 5 critical vulnerabilities</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/adobe-updates-shockwave-for-5.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59114</id>

<published>2009-11-04T15:58:34Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-04T16:22:04Z</updated>

<summary><![CDATA[ From the 'Shocking Updates' files:Adobe Shockwave users, it's time to update.Adobe has issued an updated version of its Shockwave Player to address 5 critical vulnerabilities. The flaws affect&nbsp; Adobe Shockwave Player 11.5.1.601 and prior versions. The new version is...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
<![CDATA[ From the 'Shocking Updates' files:Adobe Shockwave users, it's time to update.Adobe has issued an updated version of its Shockwave Player to address 5 critical vulnerabilities. The flaws affect&nbsp; Adobe Shockwave Player 11.5.1.601 and prior versions. The new version is...]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Sun updates Java 6 for the 17th time</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/sun-update-java-6-for-the-17th.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59113</id>

<published>2009-11-04T15:28:22Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-04T22:26:45Z</updated>

<summary>From the &apos;Still Owned by Sun&apos; files:If you&apos;re like 80 percent of all web users, chances are that you&apos;re running Java. Have you updated to the latest version yet?Yesterday, Sun released Java 6 Update 17, fixing multiple vulnerabilities. Among the...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
From the &apos;Still Owned by Sun&apos; files:If you&apos;re like 80 percent of all web users, chances are that you&apos;re running Java. Have you updated to the latest version yet?Yesterday, Sun released Java 6 Update 17, fixing multiple vulnerabilities. Among the...
<![CDATA[<blockquote><b>"The Java Runtime Environment (JRE) Java Update mechanism
 running on
non-English versions of the Windows operating system does not update the
 JRE when a new version is available," Sun wrote in its <a href="http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-269868-1">advisory</a>.<br /></b></blockquote>Yeah,
 it's a simple item but an important one. <br /><br />For many users, checking Java 
isn't something they think about. If a dialogue box pops up that says an
 update is required, well then it's likely they'll update.<br /><br />Speaking
 about Java updates, Mozilla recently launched its own effort to help 
ensure that users have the most up-to-date plugins (and Java is a plugin
 for a browser too). So Firefox users have at least one other mechanism 
beyond Sun's Update checker to rely on.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Google Chrome 4 Beta debuts including bookmark sync</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/google-chrome-4-beta-debuts-in.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59108</id>

<published>2009-11-03T15:44:33Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-03T15:59:17Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Delicious Feature&apos; files:Google&apos;s Chrome 4 web browser is now in Beta. Chrome 4 has been in the dev-channel cycle since August and has one key differentiating feature over its predecessors in the Chrome 3 browser series, bookmark...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Delicious Feature&apos; files:Google&apos;s Chrome 4 web browser is now in Beta. Chrome 4 has been in the dev-channel cycle since August and has one key differentiating feature over its predecessors in the Chrome 3 browser series, bookmark...
<![CDATA[<br />While having browser sync is not a new idea, delicious has been doing it
 for years and there have multiple add-on efforts for Firefox to include
 synchronization, Google's approach is a little different.<br /><br />Google
 is directly integrating the sync into the browser and leveraging the 
power of the Google cloud to do it. This narrows the gap between desktop
 and cloud computing and brings Chrome into the Google online services 
fold.<br /><br />Browser sync also give us a very early preview of what 
Google has in store from Chrome OS, it's netbook operating system. 
Chrome OS is of course based on the Chrome browser and I can see Google 
leveraging the same kind of sync XMPP engine on the desktop to sync and 
backup a whole lot more than just user's bookmarks.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Open Source Skype? Not yet, but soon</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/open-source-skype-not-yet-but.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59107</id>

<published>2009-11-02T21:02:35Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-02T22:03:54Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Codecs, Codecs, Codecs&apos; file:Is Skype going open source? Apparently so.&quot;Yes, there&apos;s an open source version of Linux client being developed. This will be a part of larger offering, but we can&apos;t tell you much more about that...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Codecs, Codecs, Codecs&apos; file:Is Skype going open source? Apparently so.&quot;Yes, there&apos;s an open source version of Linux client being developed. This will be a part of larger offering, but we can&apos;t tell you much more about that...
<![CDATA[<br />On the codecs side, as the open source Ogg Theora and Vorbis efforts 
continue to improve, I think that the gap between the proprietary 
patented codecs and open ones will narrow.<br /><br />There are some other 
benefits to having an open source Skype, that could specifically benefit
 Linux users.<br /><br />With an open source Skype the potential for more 
optimized integration in the future with PulseAudio and other Linux 
media sub-systems could ultimately make Linux a superior platform to 
Windows for Skype.&nbsp; ]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Google Back to Full Speed on Chrome browser dev</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/google-back-to-full-speed-on-c.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59105</id>

<published>2009-11-02T19:39:36Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-02T20:06:56Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Code Yellow Alert&apos; Files:Google Chrome development is moving along full speed ahead. Why is this news? Well let me tell you...Early last week, Google developer Anthony LaForge (no not Geordi, he&apos;s working on the warp core still...)...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Code Yellow Alert&apos; Files:Google Chrome development is moving along full speed ahead. Why is this news? Well let me tell you...Early last week, Google developer Anthony LaForge (no not Geordi, he&apos;s working on the warp core still...)...
<![CDATA[<br /><span>Should Microsoft be concerned? I think so.<br /><br />According to a 
new set of stats from Net Applications, </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: transparent; border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px;">Chrome 
is gaining on IE (though very marginally). Net Applications pegged 
Chrome usage at 3.6 percent in October up from&nbsp; 3.2 percent to 3.6 
percent in September. Yeaah it's small, but that's why Chrome Frame is 
so important to Google.</span><br /><br />With Chrome Frame, Google's addressable footprint is (theoretically) as big as IE's. No, we don't quite know at this point how many people have downloaded Chrome Frame, but the opportunity is still large for Google.<br /></span>]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 doesn&apos;t know about:me, but it&apos;s fast</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/11/post-3.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59099</id>

<published>2009-11-02T15:02:22Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-02T15:45:35Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Where Did the Features Go?&apos; files:The first official Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Beta release is now available, bringing with it a whole bunch of improvements to the open source web browser. It&apos;s also (to my naked eye) missing...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Where Did the Features Go?&apos; files:The first official Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Beta release is now available, bringing with it a whole bunch of improvements to the open source web browser. It&apos;s also (to my naked eye) missing...
<![CDATA[<br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/assets_c/2009/11/firefox.3.6_small-3963.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/assets_c/2009/11/firefox.3.6_small-3963.html','popup','width=640,height=368,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/assets_c/2009/11/firefox.3.6_small-thumb-210x120-3963.gif" alt="firefox.3.6_small.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" height="120" width="210" /></a></span>Among them is the Taskfox/Ubiquity integration. <a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/07/mozilla-ubiquity-05-update-tas.html">Ubiquity</a>
 (renamed Taskfox) is a Mozilla effort to have a command-line type tool 
for various browser and site actions.&nbsp; At one point it was supposed to 
be Firefox 3.6, but it's not in the Beta 1 release.<br /><br />Another 
(minor) item, I was looking for but didn't find is the about:me command.
 At one point about:me was supposed to be integrated into Firefox 3.6 
but it's not in the Beta (though it is available as an add-on). The idea
 with about:me is to provide users with a simple command to show them 
information about their browser usage. A minor feature, but a nifty one 
that I for one sure hope lands in a future Firefox release.<br /><br />Minor
 complaints aside, Firefox 3.6 fixes one big issue that has always 
bugged me about Firefox tab behavior. In Firefox 3.6 new tabs (when 
clicked from a link) are opened in the adjacent tab and not in new tab 
at the far end of the browser. FINALLY.&nbsp; <br /><br />The tab fix is one that I had 
hoped for in Firefox 3.5, but didn't make it in, it's great that it's in
 now. It also clearly gives us all hope that just because a particular 
feature isn't in one release, doesn't mean we won't see it sooner rather
 than later.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Where is PHP 6?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/10/where-is-php-6.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59097</id>

<published>2009-10-30T19:24:22Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-30T19:52:54Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Vaporware Language Release&apos; files:Back in 2005, I wrote a story for InternetNews.com where I wrote that I expected PHP 6 to be out in 2006. Here we are three years later and guess what? No PHP 6.Back...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Vaporware Language Release&apos; files:Back in 2005, I wrote a story for InternetNews.com where I wrote that I expected PHP 6 to be out in 2006. Here we are three years later and guess what? No PHP 6.Back...
<![CDATA[Personally, I see PHP 5.3 as a major release and perhaps a different
language might have elected to give it a major version number.&nbsp; That
said, Gutmans' question about the relevance of PHP 6 remains.<br /><br />Now
that much of the 'guts' of PHP 6 is in PHP 5.x, something else needs to
become the marquee feature of PHP 6. Sure, code cleanup and
optimizations are always important too. <br /><br />Now as 2010 nears as
opposed to 2005, I'm not sure if PHP 6 will actually come out before
Perl 6 does anymore. I'm also not sure that it matters. <br /><br />The jump from
PHP 4 to 5 was a big one and is still being dealt with by many
organizations. I suspect that PHP 5.x will remain the top dog of the
PHP world for some time to come.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The irony of Juniper Networks&apos; new branding</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/10/the-irony-of-juniper-networks.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59094</id>

<published>2009-10-29T20:06:19Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-29T21:33:44Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Competitive Irony&apos; files:In 2006, networking giant Cisco Systems revamped it&apos;s corporate logo and its branding. At the time, rival Juniper Networks, put out its own anti-Cisco branding marketing initiative, printing up T shirts with a press release...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Competitive Irony&apos; files:In 2006, networking giant Cisco Systems revamped it&apos;s corporate logo and its branding. At the time, rival Juniper Networks, put out its own anti-Cisco branding marketing initiative, printing up T shirts with a press release...
<![CDATA[<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="juniperwhite.jpg" src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/juniperwhite.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="35" width="150" /></span>The former Juniper logo (left), wasn't all that bad, but Juniper is <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3846201/Juniper+Networks+Evolves+Its+Silicon+and+More.htm">trying to re-invent itself today</a> with new technology including silicon, systems and software.<br /><br />It
makes sense to invest in research and development and that's what
Juniper has done. It also makes sense to have a marketing effort to get
the market aware of the new developments. So bringing this full circle,
even though it is ironic that Juniper is now spending money to rebrand,
the timing does make sense.<br /><br />Make no mistake about it,
branding does matter for technology companies. Though speeds and feeds
matter, so too does the brand of the company that is making the
technology. <br /><br />In my view, technology brand equity is an equation
involving the reality of performance with the perception of value that
is inherent in the brand itself.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Google Chrome development slows to fix bugs</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/10/google-chrome-development-slow.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59092</id>

<published>2009-10-29T19:47:41Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-29T20:05:26Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Rapid Release Cycles&apos; files:Since its first release a year ago, Google&apos;s Chrome browser has been updated at a rapid pace -- perhaps too rapid.This week, Chrome developer Anthony Laforge issued a &apos;Code Yellow&apos; alert and put all...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Rapid Release Cycles&apos; files:Since its first release a year ago, Google&apos;s Chrome browser has been updated at a rapid pace -- perhaps too rapid.This week, Chrome developer Anthony Laforge issued a &apos;Code Yellow&apos; alert and put all...
<![CDATA[<br />In my view, the risk of super-agile development is that key bugs can
get overlooked, which is why prioritization is so important. <br /><br />This Code
Yellow incident might just be an isolated case or it could potentially
be indicative of some larger code quality concerns within Google. In
any event the fact that it was recognized and is being dealt with is a
good thing.<br /><br />Overall though, Google Chrome itself is getting slower, for other reasons.<br /><br />Extensions for Chrome actually slow down Chrome's performance. It's something that Google developers recognize and are <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/72c636095b3cafc7?hl=en&amp;pli=1">now working on</a>.
Extensions are currently in the dev-channel build of Chrome and not yet
fit for broad consumption, but the plan is to move them into the beta
builds soon.<br /><br />Google has pitched Chrome on the merits of its
speed since day one. It'll be interesting to see as time goes on how
many trade-offs (if any) need to be made to continue to make both the
browser and browser releases themselves faster than before.]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Microsoft wants open source Eclipse to work with Windows 7</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/10/microsoft-wants-open-source-ec.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59077</id>

<published>2009-10-28T13:30:20Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-28T13:50:39Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Resistance is Futile&apos; files:Microsoft has thousands of developers building code for its platforms using Visual Studio. Thousands more use open source Eclipse based IDEs to develop their code and Microsoft wants them to target Windows platforms too.To...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Resistance is Futile&apos; files:Microsoft has thousands of developers building code for its platforms using Visual Studio. Thousands more use open source Eclipse based IDEs to develop their code and Microsoft wants them to target Windows platforms too.To...
<![CDATA[Microsoft has been working on Eclipse Tools for Silverlight since October of 2008 and is now at the 1.0 release.<br /><span class="Apple-converted-space"></span>
<blockquote><b>"The Eclipse Tools for Silverlight (Eclipse4SL) plug-in
is an open source, cross-platform plug-in for the Eclipse development
environment that enables Eclipse developers to build Silverlight Rich
Internet Applications (RIAs)," Microsoft explains in a blog post.<br />
  </b></blockquote>
<br />That's right, it's an open source Microsoft effort for Silverlight
and no it's not Novell's Mono. The Novell Mono effort is an open source
effort to provide Silverlight to Linux users, but with all of
Microsoft's own open source Silverlight efforts, I'm beginning to
wonder about its future relevance. After all, if Microsoft itself is
already doing open source releases of Silverlight related tools why is
there a need for another (similar) effort?<br /><br />The other important
thing to remember about today's Microsoft Eclipse announcements is the
practical reality for many Eclipse based IDE developers. For years I've
been told (and seen for myself) Eclipse based IDEs (from IBM Rational
and others) running on Windows desktops.<br /><br />So while Eclipse itself
is open source, many of its users have long been using Windows as their
desktop development environment anyways. As such it only makes sense to
have a solid degree of Windows interoperability. <br /><blockquote><b>"We
are always working hard to find new ways to provide more choice and
opportunity for developers in our ongoing journey to foster
interoperability between Microsoft products and other technologies,"
Microsoft's Vijay Rajagopalan wrote in a blog <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/interoperability/archive/2009/10/28/tasktop-soyatec-microsoft-to-foster-eclipse-and-microsoft-platform-interoperability.aspx">post</a>.
"We are hoping that today's announcements give developers the
additional choices and opportunities they're looking for, and that they
amount to yet another reason why choosing Microsoft platforms means
keeping all the options open." </b></blockquote>]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>U.S Department of Defense takes a shine to open source</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/10/us-department-of-defense-takes.html" />
<id>tag:blog.internetnews.com,2009:/skerner//21.59075</id>

<published>2009-10-27T20:45:24Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-27T22:00:01Z</updated>

<summary> From the &apos;Do Ask and Do Tell&apos; files:Open Source software has a role to play in the national interest and national security of the United States. That&apos;s the gist of a new U.S Department of Defense (DoD) Memorandum providing...</summary>
<author>
<name>Sean Michael Kerner</name>

</author>


<content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/">
 From the &apos;Do Ask and Do Tell&apos; files:Open Source software has a role to play in the national interest and national security of the United States. That&apos;s the gist of a new U.S Department of Defense (DoD) Memorandum providing...
<![CDATA[<br />So, no the DoD is not 'going open source.' They're already using it.<br /><br />This
new memo is not a wholesale directive encouraging the DoD to use more
open source either. All it's doing, in my 'civilian' point of view, is
restating some common sense policies that are already in place. <br />
<br />
Open source software can and should be considered for DoD bids and it
can be used to help protect the national interests of the U.S.]]>
</content>
</entry>

</feed>