Newsletters

Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!

Boston News NY News
DC News Internet Daily
SiliconValley News
InternetNews Business Report




Become a Marketplace Partner



Partner With Us















Internetnews Bloggers

Recent Entries

Archives

October 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Monthly Archives

Search The Blog

Netstat -vat by Sean Michael Kerner (bio)

A command line view of IT



SecTor's wireless wall of shame an eye opener

sector.png
From the 'Wall of Sheep' files:

TORONTO. One of the standard tables at the DefCon security conference is the Wall of Sheep, where unsecured user log-ins and passwords are displayed for all to see.

I never thought I'd see the same thing in Toronto, but I just did. I'm at the SecTor security conference and a vendor called e-sentire has a similar wall called ,the 'Wall of Shame.' The basic idea behind the wall is to catch all the users that are connecting insecurely.

Eldon Srprickerhoff founding partner of e-sentire explained to me that his company wrote its own application to sniff the traffic and capture username/passwords/cookies and other data.. As opposed to Black Hat / DefCon where the the Wall of Sheep sniffed only unencrypted traffic (that is no WPA2), this Wall was sniffing unsecured HTTP connections on both SSIDs.

The problem is that at SecTor getting the WPA2 password isn't as easy as it is at Black Hat. In order to get the password, the SecTor show guide says you have to visit the enterasys booth. I visited the booth, stood there for a few minutes and couldn't figure out where to get the WPA2 info.

The other problem is that to the best of my knowledge there was no disclaimer when you get on the open WiFi network, or even in the show guide, that the network was being monitored for a wall of shame. That doesn't seem right or fair to me.

The deeper warning of course is that a whole lot of people, at a security conference were passing their username/password for all kinds of things, in the clear. That is, they were connecting to sites/services without HTTPS. That's a big problem and could happen anywhere.

Standing for less then 3 minutes at the e-sentire booth, Sprickerhoff showed me how his company's tool not only caught the user credentials but the cookies and any attachment (for an email) that users sent.

The lesson to me is clear. Don't ever input your username/password on HTTP, because if you don't know it, someone (rightly or wrongly) could be watching you.

| Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0) | Share

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: SecTor's wireless wall of shame an eye opener.

TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/9035

4 Comments

Peter Hillier said:

Wouldn't this practice in Canada be considered a criminal offense? Especially when you display the credentials of the user?

Wael said:

There were sufficient warnings regarding the nature of each connection method; anyone connecting without understanding the consequences is clearly a n00b.

There is no criminal offense here. Against whom, and perpetrated by who?

snapcase said:

actually, if you research canadian law, it's extremely illegal to monitor wireless traffic without the consent of the user. regardless of the 'type' of conference you're attending this shouldn't have happened at the conference and for this reason i will never attend a sector conference again.

cjp said:

Ok, so lets assume for a moment that no one on the wireless has captured your credentials.

You are sending your credentials over the public internet unencrypted.

Stop. Doing. This.

Leave a comment