Newsletters

Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!

Boston News NY News
DC News Internet Daily
SiliconValley News
InternetNews Business Report




Become a Marketplace Partner



Partner With Us















Internetnews Bloggers

Recent Entries

Archives

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Monthly Archives

Search The Blog

Netstat -vat by Sean Michael Kerner (bio)

A command line view of IT



Mozilla SeaMonkey FINALLY hits 2.0

seamonkey.png
From the 'Long Release Cycle' files:

Remember the Mozilla Suite? Or maybe you remember Netscape Communicator?

Neither of those all-in-one browser solutions exists under either of those names anymore, but their successor SeaMonkey is still (surprisingly) around and kinda/sorta moving forward.

Today, the SeaMonkey project released version 2.0.  Yeah version 2.0. We've got IE 8, Firefox 3.5 and Safari 4 which are all 'younger' projects in many ways but SeaMonkey is a version 2.0, go figure.

In my view, this is a release that has been a long time coming.

The last time I wrote about SeaMonkey was the 1.6 release in 2004, when Mozilla still held the reigns of the project and Firefox was just taking off. Back in 2004, SeaMonkey was the Mozilla codename for the Mozilla suite, but it has since branched off into its own seperate effort with legal backing from Mozilla.

Just like the Netscape Communicator and Mozilla Suites (that I personally relied on for many years), SeaMonkey includes a web-browser, advanced e-mail, newsgroup and feed client, IRC chat, and HTML editing capabilities.

With SeaMonkey 2.0, the project has now moved to a Firefox 3.5.x base for the underlying web browser. The mail client has also been updated providing additional stability for users. All good stuff, but does it really matter?

With all the extensibility of the Firefox model with its add-ons, I'm not sure there is a place for the whole suite anymore.

While it may have been normal back in the Netscape Communicator days to have a big all-in-one program, today users want to do it themselves.

Firefox was created and has become successful because it's core focus is the browser. With Firefox, Mozilla made the browser cool again and re-invigorated both its own organization and community as well as the whole browser space.

There are always those that want what they used to have. As such, I suspect there will be a place for SeaMonkey for a long time to come. In my case, I moved from the Mozilla Suite to Firefox in 2004 and I haven't looked back since.

| Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0) | Share

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Mozilla SeaMonkey FINALLY hits 2.0.

TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/9160

3 Comments

Actually, I use SeaMonkey and continue to like it. The Web browser, Mail, and Composer components just work. I will be upgrading immediately to the new version 2.0.

Congrats, SeaMonkey team!

--TP

Keith said:

I agree with Terrell. Actually, I only use the browser component of SeaMonkey, but it works great and has the perfect UI. No matter how much I customize Firefox, how many add-ons I get, or how many themes/skins I try, I just can't get it to look decent, but SeaMonkey looks great after only minimal tweaking. I only use three extensions in SeaMonkey and that's good from a performance POV (anyone can write an extension/add-on and doesn't really have to test it at all).

Steve said:

FWIW, I was using Firefox 3.5.4/Thunderbird 2.0, but Thunderbird didn't work optimally with Gmail's special IMAP folders. Well Seamonkey 2.0 does.

I don't really know if I really need the added search functionality (Gloda database, etc) that Thunderbird 3.0 has. Also, anytime a program gets as many radical changes as TB 3.0 has received will need a lot of TLC (and it will get it, don't get me wrong) before I'll use it in a production environment on my older laptop.

Leave a comment