Newsletters Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!
Internetnews BloggersRecent Entries
ArchivesMonthly ArchivesSearch The Blog
« Google Chrome NOT at risk from Carpet Bombing flaw |
Sean Michael Kerner Blog
| Google Chrome Internets Easter egg »
Red Hat's $107 million virtualization gambit From the 'we love Xen - sorta' files:
Red Hat is buying KVM vendor Qumranet for $107 million. It's a big move but I'm not surprised and neither should anyone else. I've been following and using the open source virtualization Xen project for years. Red Hat of course has been supporting Xen for years too. But now Red Hat is taking aim at every other virtualization vendor - be it Citrix, VMware or Microsoft - with this buy. The argument is simple: The OS is critical and the OS is what Red Hat is all about. "You may not know this but most virtualization solutions today use components developed by Red Hat for their critical functions," Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens said on a conference call. "These competitors are highly dependent on Red Hat for feature development and hardware enablement - no one is better equipped to carry open source leadership forward."It's all about being a bare metal hypervisor - which is what KVM (developed by Qumranet) is all about. Bare metal means it is part of Linux as opposed to running on top of Linux and the promise is that of greater control, speed and security. Red Hat argues that neither Citrix nor VMware can compete at the same level. The only one that can compete is Microsoft, since they too control their own OS. It's an interesting technical argument and one that no doubt Citrix and VMware will retort with public statements and bravado. Stevens however holds the higher technical ground and ultimately the market itself will prove whose message and technology will reign supreme. So why am I not surprised? Well Red Hat always wants to leverage its core assets - namely it's Linux operating system. Red Hat also always wants to be in a leadership role. Ever since Citrix acquired XenSource, I don't think that Red Hat had the control they wanted. But even more fundamentally it's always about being faster and trying to innovate. KVM is innovative and represents a new direction for virtualization. 0 TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Red Hat's $107 million virtualization gambit. TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/4799 2 CommentsLeave a comment |
||
Good move by Red Hat. Xen has too much politics involved and is a difficult technology to keep current with the kernel. I recon RHEL6 will ship with KVM but Xen will fade away with RHEL5
KVM is actually the exact opposite of what you describe. It's a Type II, or hosted, hypervisor. It sits on top of Linux. From Qumranet's Web site:
"KVM's architecture is optimized to utilize the native functionality of the underlying operating system (for now Linux)"
KVM is essentially a snap-in to Linux. You could even make the argument that it's not a hypervisor at all, since it does some of a hypervisor's functions and not others, like scheduling and memory management. It's generally called a hypervisor, but it seems to me more of a gray area.