Newsletters

Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!

Boston News NY News
DC News Internet Daily
SiliconValley News
InternetNews Business Report




Become a Marketplace Partner



Partner With Us















Internetnews Bloggers

Recent Entries

Archives

April 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Monthly Archives

Search The Blog

Netstat -vat by Sean Michael Kerner (bio)

A command line view of IT



Irreconcilable conflict between $ and Open Source ?!

GPL.v3.jpgFrom the 'FUD watch' files:

I'm always on the lookout for open source FUD. Today I came across an interesting piece today titled, "Legal Climate for Open-Source Users Changes With Litigation and License Revisions, Wolf Greenfield Lawyer Writes in IP Law & Business"  No that's not the FUD part as there is little doubt that the GPL 3 and the recent activities of the Software Freedom Law Center in defense of GPL have raised the profile of GPL enforcement.

The SFLC lawsuits have also had the unfortunate side effect of providing some FUD fodder too, if the Wolf Greenfield lawyer comments are an indication.
"The {SFLC} lawsuits represent 'muscle-flexing' by the free-software community and, taken together with changes in open source license terms, may foreshadow new risks in the irreconcilable conflict between open-source software and its widespread use by for-profit companies," Edmund J. Walsh of the Boston IP law firm Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., writes in the April issue of IP Law & Business.
hUH?!

Let's repeat the salient point here - "..the irreconcilable conflict between open source software and its widespread use by for-profit companies."

I guess this particular attorney has never heard of Red Hat (aiming for $1 billion in revenue), Oracle (runs its own infrastructure on open source software), Cisco (world's largest networking vendor that is now backing Linux) and many other for profit vendors that all have somehow RECONCILED open source and profit.

The notion that open source somehow is an inhibitor to making a profit hearkens back to the earliest days of open source when it was a concept that was poorly understood and not well adopted by enterprises. It's 2008 now and open source is a vehicle for innovation and profit.

The actions of the SFLC in my honest opinion are the necessary actions of a legal group to defend the rights of developers, pure and simple. If you use code licensed under terms of a license (any license) than you're bound by the terms of the license. It's not about open or closed source. It's about the legal license and it's a shame that some just don't get it.

| Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0) | Share

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Irreconcilable conflict between $ and Open Source ?!.

TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/3645

1 Comments

Tony Lovasco said:

Oh, and don't forget Google and Paypal (eBay), who both utilize a huge amount of Free Software.

You've got it spot on -- this is just FUD.

Leave a comment