Newsletters Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!
Internetnews BloggersRecent Entries
ArchivesMonthly ArchivesSearch The Blog
« Kerry backing bill to boost electronic medical records |
Kenneth Corbin Blog
| Lawmakers to probe broadband, privacy, cybersecurity »
Groups mount preemptive strike against Comcast-NBCThere's not even an official merger yet, but already an opposition coalition is preparing for a big fight. Taking aim at the widely anticipated but still-unannounced merger of Comcast and NBC Universal, media-reform group and Washington busybody Free Press today hosted a press call to kick off its preemptive protest against the deal. "We've never seen this kind of consolidated control over so many platforms," Free Press Executive Director Josh Silver told reporters, referring to the players' leading positions in broadcast and cable TV and the Internet. "Despite the rhetoric of the merging parties, the inevitable result is that consumer end up with fewer choices and higher prices," he said. Silver was joined by representatives of the Consumer Federation of America and the Communications Workers of America, a union that represents thousands of workers employed by each company. Also on board was Gilles BianRosa, CEO of video startup Vuze, which petitioned the FCC last year to take action against Comcast for throttling Internet traffic on its network. The participants spoke of the merger as a done deal, though a formal announcement isn't rumored to come until next week, at the earliest. With a rumored $30 billion price tag, the deal would indeed be a blockbuster. The complex transaction appears to be on hold as NBC Universal appeals to French company Vivendi to shed its 20 percent stake in the entertainment company. The deal would see Comcast take a controlling 51 percent share, leaving NBC with the remaining 49 percent of the joint venture. Free Press has dedicated a special section of its Web site to the opposition campaign, which will lean on lawmakers and antitrust authorities and anyone else who will listen to its message that the deal would involve major a major consolidation of the media landscape, while bringing together content distribution in a union that would give Comcast every incentive to promote NBC's programming at the expense of other networks. Under the screaming block letters reading "No Merger!" Free Press writes: "Talk about a bad marriage. Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, is getting hitched to NBC, one of the world's biggest producers of TV shows and motion pictures. For consumers, it means higher prices, fewer choices and less innovation. This is one wedding we need to stop!" Silver noted that the Obama administration has made it clear that it intends to "reinvigorate the nation's antitrust laws," which could include a lengthy review of the merger, and approval only with significant conditions, such as the divestiture of NBC's broadcast affiliates and firm commitments to keep its online content available on non-Comcast Web sites, such as Hulu, the joint venture between NBC and News Corp. "Hulu is the perfect example of nascent competition on the Internet platform as a threat of the market power of the cable distributors," said Mark Cooper, research director with the Consumer Federation of America. "Given the magnitude of the merger, we think the simpler and more direct way to preserve competition would be to just say no." 0 TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Groups mount preemptive strike against Comcast-NBC. TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/9274 7 CommentsLeave a comment |
||
Even though I am a Comcast subscriber, I don't want Comeast to stifle freedom for internet and telephone innovation!
Everyone should cancel their TV anyway.
It is not fair that companies like Comcast even exist. We need more legislation that stops Media Mergers. Why should companies that contributed nothing to the development of the internet get to control it?
We let Banks get to big. We sure don't need a cable network having control of a TV network. You talk about one sided. Fox, controlled by Rupert Murdock is bad enough and should be broken up. We do not need controlled media. This would be like communism with the airways told what to say. We need totally free news sources, unbiased.
John Poe
Large corporations already control much of our Media, corporations whose primary purpose is to make money, not keep up informed. We need some trust busting, not mergers. A Democracy cannot survive with a truly free press.
We are in a recession-depression with unemployment around 13% and maybe up to 17%. Like in the 1930's, this economic trouble allowed large corporations to merge and buy up smaller corporations.
This merger would allow too much power for another huge corporation. Comcast and NBC already have too much power. If Congress is for the American people then it will smash down this merger. Freedom requires a free press, including an open Internet.
This merger is once again another step to halt free press, open internet and a TV network that is a shill for a corporation instead of a free and open media. Big business is ruining our democracy. It is a horrid proposition.