Newsletters

Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!

Boston News NY News
DC News Internet Daily
SiliconValley News
InternetNews Business Report




Become a Marketplace Partner



Partner With Us















Internetnews Bloggers

Recent Entries

Archives

October 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Monthly Archives

Search The Blog

Policy Fugue by Kenneth Corbin (bio)

Tracking the loveless marriage of technology and government



P2P security bill clears House committee

A bill to protect users from inadvertently sharing files through peer-to-peer networks is headed to the House floor after clearing the Energy and Commerce Committee today in a markup session.

The Informed P2P User Act would require file-sharing network providers, such as Limewire, to provide clear and meaningful notice before making the files on users' computers available to share, and to make it easier for users to block or disable peer-to-peer software.

"Too many people aren't aware of the risks associated with using popular peer-to-peer file-sharing programs," Republican Mary Bono Mack, the bill's sponsor, said in a statement. "When users login to these P2P programs, they could be inadvertently sharing ALL of their personal information with everyone else on the network, including tax returns, financial records, personal messages and family photos."

The issue of inadvertent file-sharing gained prominence after it was discovered that the schematics of a U.S. warplane and information about a safe house for the president's family had surfaced on peer-to-peer networks.

The Lime Group has testified in Congress that it addressed the vulnerabilities Bono Mack's bill is designed to prevent in the most recent version of the Limewire application.

The bill would allocate enforcement authority to the Federal Trade Commission.

| Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0) | Share

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: P2P security bill clears House committee.

TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/9008

1 Comments

fred-anon said:

I work for a government agency. We do not allow employees to install software (users have restricted rights accounts on workstations). Our 2 level firewall (ours and upstream govt provider) closes every port except those needed for business (2 level vetting), and then only to known and researched IP addresses. The local Internet web content filter blocks all websites except those appropriate for children. There are exceptions to blocking made on a verified case-by-case basis (cheap cost of doing business). We have never had P2P problems on this corporate network during my tenure.

Leave a comment