Newsletters Select newsletters below and click the button to sign up!
Internetnews BloggersRecent Entries
Archives
Monthly ArchivesSearch The Blog
« Facebook at five |
Christopher Saunders Blog
| Google News stumbles, complainers don't miss a beat »
Protesters take to the streets for Kindle's 'Read to Me'
The battle lines are being drawn here in midtown Manhattan: On one side, the Authors Guild, which recently won concessions from Amazon.com over the text-to-speech feature in its Kindle 2 e-book reader. On the other, a collection of groups including the National Federation of the Blind and the Reading Rights Coalition, protesting the Guild's restrictions on the Kindle's text-to-speech functionality. Those groups are now holding a protest outside the Authors Guild headquarters -- a few blocks away from our own New York office -- to highlight their take on the Guild's position as being "contrary to the principle of equal opportunity for all" and discriminatory against the 15 million Americans with print disabilities.
"Today's protest is unfortunate and unnecessary," Authors Guild Executive Director Paul Aiken responded in a statement. "We stand by our offer, first made to the Federation's lawyer a month ago and repeated several times since, to negotiate in good faith to reach a solution for making in-print e-books accessible to everyone. We extend that same offer to any group representing the disabled."
Aiken also said he proposed to the NFB "the only lawful and speedy path to make e-books accessible to the print disabled on Amazon's Kindle." In his statement, Aiken said the Copyright Act's Chafee Amendment allows "users with certified physical print disabilities" to access audio versions of copyrighted books. He said that certified users who also own Kindles could activate their devices online to enable access to voice-output versions of all e-books. "This process could be ready to go within weeks," he said. But the NFB said in a statement that if the Guild doesn't change its tune, users who can't read print "must either submit to a burdensome special registration system and prove our disabilities -- or pay extra." Who knew that text-to-speech, a technology that's been kicking around for decades, would spur such a showdown? The issue around the feature, dubbed "Read to Me," first arose with the launch of the Kindle 2 earlier this year. Not long afterward, the Authors Guild sent an e-mail to members yesterday stating the feature presents a "significant challenge" to the publishing industry. At the time, the Guild said Amazon lacked legal the authorized to create text-to-speech readings of books. The Guild also recommended that publishers include text-to-speech technology in their future contract negotiations over e-books, and that they delay granting e-book rights until the issue is resolved. Amazon appeared to wave away the complaint, however. But within weeks, it backtracked on the issue, announcing plans to give copyright holders the opportunity to specify whether their e-books would support the feature. The company said it would revamping its publishing system to enable writers, authors and publishers to disable the technology on a case-by-case basis. It's still uncertain how it's all going to play out. Aiken pointed to the Guild's recent settlement with Google over its practice of making scanned, out-of-print books available online helped the print disabled gain better access to their contents as a sign that the Guild's willing to work out a solution. "We're confident we can arrive at a solution for in-print books as well," he said. Aiken also said that the publishing industry needs to amend its book contracts to better address shortcomings relating to e-book rights, including covering users with learning disabilities who don't qualify for special treatment under Chafee. Still, he made it clear that the Guild is also sticking to its guns on what it sees as a potential case of surrendering its members' rights. "The Authors Guild will gladly be a forceful advocate for amending contracts to provide access to voice-output technology to everyone. We will not, however, surrender our members' economic rights to Amazon or anyone else. The leap to digital has been brutal for print media generally, and the economics of the transition from print to e-books do not look as promising as many assume. Authors can't afford to start this transition to digital by abandoning rights." At any rate, I guess it took the Kindle to make e-books a mainstream interest (sorry, Sony) -- evidently, it's also taken the Kindle to make text-to-speech something of a cause célèbre. 0 TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Protesters take to the streets for Kindle's 'Read to Me'. TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/7805 2 CommentsLeave a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't have a certified print disability but I do have a time disability combined with a fund shortage. I cannot afford $50 for recorded books and I cannot spare the time to sit down and read a hard copy. If I am unable to obtain the audio format at a reasonable cost, the book will not be read.
The Reading Rights Coalition has set up an on-line petition to urge the Authors Guild and Amazon to reverse course. Please read, sign, and pass along the petition to all your friends and family: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/We-Want-To-Read