<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/blog/">
<title>Internetnews Blog</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/blog/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T19:01:11-05:002008-09-05T13:20:12-05:002008-09-05T17:40:28-05:002008-09-05T16:02:31-05:002008-09-05T10:25:26-05:002008-09-05T10:14:12-05:002008-09-04T20:42:25-05:002008-09-04T17:25:39-05:002008-09-04T17:22:19-05:002008-09-04T15:07:14-05:002008-09-04T09:50:12-05:002008-09-03T20:30:09-05:002008-09-03T16:55:20-05:002008-09-03T16:00:05-05:002008-09-03T14:07:21-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.01" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/the-curious-case-of-the-micros.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/ejoyce/2008/09/amazon-moving-ahead-of-ipod-ne.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpcs-amazon-notebook-linux-on.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/csaunders/2008/09/netsuite-chromeing-it-up-for-f.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/samsungs-courting-sandisk.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/big-quarter-for-ip-router-vend.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/bill-jerry-at-the-shoe-circus.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/campaign-tech-obamas-ringing-e.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpc-taps-amazon-for-low-cost.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-internets-easter.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/red-hats-107-million-virtualiz.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/google-all-your-webs-are-belon.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-not-at-risk-from.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/metallicas-new-album-leaks-but.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/death-knell-for-nebuad.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>



<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/the-curious-case-of-the-micros.html">
<title>The curious case of the Microsoft-Seinfeld ad</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/the-curious-case-of-the-micros.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Seinfeld has a long and storied history as a shill, and an unapologetic one at that. Think back to the 1990's: care for a Snapple? Then there are the HP commercials, which he used as a promotional vehicle for his own Bee Movie. He's a proven quantity, for certain.</p>

<p>But for Microsoft to tap into the Seinfeld sparkle to rehabilitate its public image in the face of the relentless onslaught of the "I'm a Mac" commercials? Seems an odd choice.</p>

<p>Granted, we've only seen one so far, and we're assuming they'll get a little more product-y as the campaign develops. After all, Seinfeld's inked to a $10 million deal, so we know Microsoft's in it for the long haul.</p>

<p>For those who haven't yet seen the spot, I'm not going to rehash its contents, but you can find it <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afR5J7eskno">here</a>.</p>

<p>So what insight do we gain into the Microsoft marketing strategy from this spot? For starters, it seems clear that Microsoft isn't trying to beat Apple at its own game, namely appealing to the techno-chic, laid-back hipsters so memorably exemplified by the delightfully smarmy Justin Long. To be fair, on that last descriptive, the humor of the "I'm a Mac" ads goes a long way toward defraying the natural repulsion of Long as a pitchman -- not so for Chad from the Alltel ads or Matt Walton, who shills for Optimum's triple play in the New York market. Apple's ads are clever, and often very funny.</p>

<p>Right -- it seems fair to say that by pairing Seinfeld with Gates Microsoft went a different way. Maybe it's less about youth than wisdom.</p>

<p>If the first is any indicator, it seems clear that the ads will be intended to play up Gates the icon. Last year Forbes <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2007/09/28/winfrey-forbes-tvceleb.html">ranked</a> Jerry Seinfeld as the second-highest paid television star behind only Oprah, and his show had been off the air for nearly a decade. Yet in the Microsoft ad we have him on his knees fitting Bill Gates for shoes.</p>

<p>But let's also remember that Seinfeld is a comedian, albeit one whose humor isn't very close to what you'd call youthful or edgy. But that's not Microsoft's image. There's nothing in the first Seinfeld spot that's laugh-out-loud funny. But there are hints, attempts at humor -- the Shoe Circus club card is kind of cute, showering in your shoes is typical Seinfeld-wacky, and Microsoft making computers that you can eat like cake is a nice thought. The point I see in this is that Microsoft isn't trying to cast off its button-down image with a single video spot, but it would like you to understand that it, too, can take it light.</p>

<p>It's also trying to keep above the fray. It's hard to imagine taking a more direct shot at the competition than what you find in the "I'm a Mac" ads. You don't get that from the Seinfeld spot -- instead, we see the legendary comedian walking reverently beside the man who seems content to trade on his legacy as the father of the modern software industry.</p>

<p>Then there is the curious mention of the "conquistador." Is Microsoft suggesting that Bill Gates is buying eponymous shoes? Are we to imagine Bill as the conquistador? Microsoft? The Spanish family noting that, "They run tight" seems like a playful bit of self-deprecation to me. Microsoft's reputation isn't that of a loose company.</p>

<p>There's also a well-worn adage about Microsoft that when it can't build market share, it tries to buy it. Yahoo comes to mind. So the conquistador bit can't help but conjure the image of Microsoft as a company whose success is owed to the sword.</p>

<p>More likely it's a joshing reference to Gates as a world-beater.</p>

<p>But the fact that it can't be said with certainty is what makes it fun. While many of the "I'm a Mac" ads flirt with brilliance, they've got about as much subtlety as a Claymore mine. What a great spectator sport we'll have if the rest of the spots in the campaign are as oblique as this one.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Kenneth Corbin</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T19:01:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/ejoyce/2008/09/amazon-moving-ahead-of-ipod-ne.html">
<title>Amazon: Moving ahead of iPod News</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/ejoyce/2008/09/amazon-moving-ahead-of-ipod-ne.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008">If you're going to 
launch a media download service, rule #1 is to make sure you don't announce it 
within shouting distance of Apple's upcoming iPod release news next week.<br /><br />That's the take on Amazon's 
release of its download service, which the 
e-tailer rolled out this week. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/video/ontv/start">streaming media</a> service offers a wide selection of movies and television shows. Very nice line up, actually.<br /></span></font></div><div>&nbsp;</div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008"></span></font>&nbsp;


<div><font size="2" face="Arial">&nbsp;<span class="906290023-04092008">But what's the fate 
of <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3631106.">Unbox</a>? Why it's got a new name, according to Amazon:</span></font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008"></span></font>&nbsp;</div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008"></span></font>&nbsp;<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008"></span></font>&nbsp;</div>


<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008">Of course, Apple has 
an AppleTV strategy that awaits its own closeup and the buzz is that next Tuesday's iPod release party will feature news regarding <a href="http://www.apple.com/appletv/">AppleTV</a>, which hasn't been as big a hit since it <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3631666">came out</a>.</span></font> <br /></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><span class="906290023-04092008">MacWorld's got some <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/135380/2008/09/addradiotoappletv.html">recent juice </a>about it, as does <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/09/03/3-big-ideas-for-apples-big-event.aspx">Motley Fool</a>.<br /></span></font></div><br />At any rate, back to Amazon. It's got a lot of slick offerings and builds on its early success with music downloads. as well as Amazon's larger plan to be a major online seller of digital content: software, services, music and yes, movies.<font size="2"><font face="Arial"></font></font><br />]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Erin Joyce</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T13:20:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpcs-amazon-notebook-linux-on.html">
<title>OLPC&apos;s Amazon Notebook Linux Only </title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpcs-amazon-notebook-linux-on.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> The folks at One Laptop Per Child got back to me with a statement following <a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpc-taps-amazon-for-low-cost.html">my recent blog post </a>on its plans to sell through online commerce giant, Amazon. </p>

<p>It was tough to get many details on this story because the only information came from a news items briefly quoting an OLPC team member who blabbed prematurely about the Amazon deal. An OLPC spokesperson told me the group didn&#8217;t issue a press release because Amazon doesn&#8217;t announce things until they&#8217;re available at their online storefront. </p>

<p>My original post described how Amazon plans to offer XO Laptops as part of OLPCs &#8220;Give One, Get One&#8221; program where you essentially pay for two of the devices, keep one and let OLPC ship the other one to a child in a developing country. </p>

<p>Today&#8217;s statement from Amazon adds a few more details, starting with, why the switch to Amazon: </p>

<p>&#8220;Although the first iteration of the &#8216;G1,G1&#8217; program was extremely successful and sold more then 185,000 laptops, the delivery of the laptops in the USA did not run as smoothly as we anticipated.  Selling the laptops on Amazon.com will provide us with the resources to process and ship the laptops globally in a timely fashion.&#8221; </p>

<p>Secondly, Amazon spelled out that although OLPC has talked about working with Microsoft, Windows is not part of this offering. </p>

<p>&#8220;Contrary to <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/090408-olpcs-dual-boot-linux-windows.html">some media reports</a>, it will be a Linux-based XO Laptop that will be offered as part of the global initiative and not a dual-boot machine running both Windows and Linux,&#8221; OLPC said in a statement. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>David Needle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T17:40:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/csaunders/2008/09/netsuite-chromeing-it-up-for-f.html">
<title>NetSuite: Chrome-ing it up for fun and profit</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/csaunders/2008/09/netsuite-chromeing-it-up-for-f.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><table border="0" width="215" align="left"><tr><td><img src="http://www.internetnews.com/img/2008/09/sr-google-200x180-chrome5.jpg" alt="Google Chrome" border="1" Height="150" Width="200"></td></tr></table>NetSuite is first out of the box in support of Google Chrome -- and in support of the surge of buzz around the much-discussed, variously (depending on where you look) Firefox-killing, IE-killing, paradigm-killing browser.  </p>

<p>Yes, the SMB and enterprise SaaS vendor released <a href="http://www.netsuite.com/portal/press/releases/nlpr09-05-08.shtml">a statement today</a> pledging that its wares are "Optimized with Google Chrome Browser."  And yes, you'll need to set your personal anti-hype shielding to full for this one.</p>

<p>To anyone who's even glanced at a tech news site in the past couple of days, <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3769021/">Chrome</a> needs no introduction.  But is it ready for prime time in the workplace?  Even suggesting that seems... problematic.</p>

<p>Here's what NetSuite had to say:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>As the first business application with native support for iPhone and Firefox 3.0 (announced in July), NetSuite continues to focus on innovation around the latest browser technology and is also one of the first business applications to support Google Chrome. In addition to NetSuite CRM, Ecommerce and accounting software products, OpenAir -- a NetSuite company and a leader in on-demand professional services automation software -- also added support for the new Google Chrome Browser.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>My question is:  At what point is the line between "the latest" and "the so-early-it's-unfinished" blurred?  I think it's right here, folks.</p>

<p><table border="0" width="215" align="left"><tr><td><img src="http://www.internetnews.com/img/2008/09/chrome-issues.jpg" alt="servers" border="0" Height="265" Width="200"><BR><font size="-2"><B>A sample of Chrome's known issues from Google's <a href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2"><font size="-2">support site</font></a>. A good start, but is it ready for your business app?</B></font></td></tr></table>Remember, Chrome is beta software.  And uniquely for beta-happy Google, it's a release that <I>feels</I> like a beta.</p>

<p>You've got your early security concerns.  A spartan UI.  A lack of <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080902/first-test-of-googles-new-browser/">a great number of features that users expect from their Web browsers</a>.   As Walt Mossberg pointed out, there's no way to send links via e-mail, and no easy way to manage bookmarks.  </p>

<p>OK, fine.  But that's on top of a slew of glitches and other shortcomings that suggest it's not quite ready for its big enterprise debut.  Chrome does not support SSL client authentication.  It occasionally plays havoc with a number of online apps -- <a href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2&amp;ctx=topic">Google's own Apps included</a>.  Hmm.</p>

<p>None of these shortcomings are difficult to find.  What's NetSuite's take on all this?  It's not the flaws of the browser the company is focusing on...  Rather, it's the innovation it wants to celebrate.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"At NetSuite, we strive to offer our customers the latest innovations that will enable the greatest degree of choice, flexibility and productivity," said Per Jakobsen, Vice President of Product Management at NetSuite. "We salute Google for the innovation they've offered in their new Chrome Browser and are pleased to be able to offer early support for Chrome to all NetSuite and OpenAir customers."</p>
</blockquote>

<p><table border="0" width="265" align="left"><tr><td><img src="http://www.internetnews.com/img/2008/09/google_chrome_snap.jpg" alt="Google Chrome Crash Aw Snap" border="0" Height="202" Width="250"><BR><B><font size="-2">Aw, Snap! A Chrome error message. You can also see this by navigating to the URL <a href="about:crash"><font size="-2">about:crash</font></a> in the browser.</font></B></td></tr></table>Does Chrome work better than other browsers?  Sure, in some cases.  I'm proud to report that (as I had desperately hoped) it doesn't get bogged down the same way Firefox does after a few hours of use.  (Will Mozilla follow suit and redesign Firefox similarly? Fingers crossed.)  For some individual users, Chrome's benefits may be worth the price of admission, glitches and all.  But do enterprises want to make the same bet?</p>

<p>Even NetSuite retreats somewhat on its pledge of "support."  Buried at the bottom of its press release, it admits that "NetSuite support for Google Chrome is being rolled out now in phases to customers. Once the rollout is complete in mid-October, all NetSuite and OpenAir functionality will work with Google Chrome's current release."</p>

<p>And, it adds a caveat:  "Google's Chrome Browser, as a new release, is still in beta version and has not yet been certified for full release by Google."</p>

<p>Oh.  Er...  Okay, then.  So, does this hedging sound to anyone else like NetSuite is placing the onus for dealing with Chrome problems soundly on its users?  They're proud to tout support for Chrome, only it's not available to everyone yet, and frankly, doesn't really seem all that finished.  </p>

<p>I'm sold -- how about you?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Christopher Saunders</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T16:02:31-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/samsungs-courting-sandisk.html">
<title>Samsung&apos;s courting SanDisk</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/samsungs-courting-sandisk.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Reuters is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSSEO16274820080905">reporting</a> this morning that top chip maker Samsung Electronics is mulling buying up flash memory maker SanDisk, though a spokesperson said a decision hasn't been made.</p>

<p>The move would be a huge boost for Samsung financially and market wise. </p>

<p>It would save $350 million a year it now pays SanDisk in licensing fees, and as flash memory is gaining big ground with storage vendors it could propel Samsung into the lucrative industry.</p>

<p>Reuters noted that Seagate was rumoured to be courting SanDisk last month.</p>

<p>The big loser, according to analysts quoted, would be Toshiba, which partners with SanDisk and competes with Samsung. No surprise stock prices fell for Toshiba but were up for both SanDisk and Samsung this morning. </p>

<p>The $3B plus deal would likely hit some challenging regulatory reviews, say pundits, over anti-trust concerns.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jmottl</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T10:25:26-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/big-quarter-for-ip-router-vend.html">
<title>Big quarter for IP router vendors </title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/big-quarter-for-ip-router-vend.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="cisco.gif" src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/cisco.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="110" height="73" /></span> <div>From the "<i>big $$$</i>" files:<br /><br />The continued growth of the Internet and demand for more access and speed are fueling big numbers in IP routers. The latest Infonetics Research report on Service Provider Routers and Switches is reporting that<a href="http://www.infonetics.com/login"></a> Worldwide service provider core and edge IP router revenue hit $2.6    billion in 2Q08.<br /><br />According to Infonetics, manufacturer revenues are up by 40 percent on a year over basis over 2Q07 and 17 percent on a&nbsp; sequential quarter-over-quarter basis.<br /><br />Infonetics specifically pointed out Cisco's gains clocking in at, ".<i>..a 15 percent&nbsp; gain in combined IP edge and core
router revenue, giving them over half the worldwide market, a position
they've maintained since 2005, despite growing competition</i>."<br /><br />Cisco rivals Juniper and Alcatel-Lucent also posted what Infonetics referred to as respectable single digit revenue gains. All in all the outlook offered by Infonetics seems to point to continued growth for the remainder of the year though economic concerns could put a damper on things.<br /><blockquote><b>"Since the upturn in 2003 from the great telecom downturn, IP router
revenue has grown 20 percent to over 30 percent each year, and we expect the trend to
continue in 2008," <a href="http://www.infonetics.com/bios.asp?id=mh">Michael Howard</a>,
principal analyst and co-founder of Infonetics.
said in a statement. "The 2 big drivers for continued growth are expanding
traffic and IP transformation projects, with traffic the stronger factor."<br /></b></blockquote></div>]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Sean Kerner</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T10:14:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/bill-jerry-at-the-shoe-circus.html">
<title>Bill &amp; Jerry at the Shoe Circus</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/bill-jerry-at-the-shoe-circus.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I had heard that Microsoft was looking to come back with an ad that would blow the Mac vs. PC guys away.</p>

<p>I love those guys. Yes I'm a Mac groupie from college, but I've also come around to see the beauty of the PC. And I just always found both of them cute and funny, and entertaining.</p>

<p>About three minutes ago I saw the advertising response from Microsoft. I think anyway. </p>

<p>I think but not sure because it was soooooooooo badddddddd.</p>

<p>Jerry Seinfeld's walking the mall, sees Bill Gates trying on shoes at Shoe Circus, runs in and has an inane conversation during which he asks Bill if he wants a Churro (which Jerry is munching on), measures Bill's foot at one point, asking, 'is that your toe,' to which Bill says 'no, it's leather,' and then shows Bill how to stretch the shoes to fit (Gates is a size 10 by the way) and Bill gets shoes.</p>

<p>As they walk out the parking lot (both with Churros in hand at this point) Jerry asks some inane question about a new PC that can be eaten while you work on it (I need to rewind the DVR and check that I will admit). </p>

<p>I think Jerry then asks Gates to answer using his 'shorts' and Gates slows his pace, wiggles his tush and Seinfeld proclaims yippee.</p>

<p>Maybe it's me. Maybe it's the Microsoft advertising team. </p>

<p>But to have one of the funniest guys in the last decade and one of the greatest, if not greatest, computing visionaries on television, in the same skit and not create one genuine moment beyond disbelief is a testament.</p>

<p>A testament to what, though, is what I'll be pondering as I watch it again and again.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jmottl</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T20:42:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/campaign-tech-obamas-ringing-e.html">
<title>Campaign Tech: Obama&apos;s ringing endorsements...</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/jmottl/2008/09/campaign-tech-obamas-ringing-e.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I got to thinking today about what our Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates use and don't use when it comes to technology.</p>

<p>So I fired off some emails to the two campaigns, with questions about what each candidate thinks about technology today, the impact to our lives at work and at play, and what, if any, technology they use on a personal basis.</p>

<p>As I await responses, I decided to do a little checking around, starting with their respective campaign sites and I have to admit, as a registered independent, I'm slightly impressed with Obama-Biden's '<a href="http://www.barackobama.com/mobilev2/">Mobile</a>' page.</p>

<p>12 ringtones with Obama's voice booming out various messages right there for the downloading. </p>

<p>And some of them are downright spunky and be-bopping.</p>

<p>There's something for every music lover it seems -- a little rap, a little jazz, a little gospel, a little hard rock, a little inspirational gospel sounding.</p>

<p>I didn't hear any Barry White ringtone rendition, though, which is disappointing as I likely would have downloaded that just for the fun of it, and conversation-starting aspect ;)</p>

<p>My favorite (in terms of beat that is) is No. 7.</p>

<p>There are also some wallpaper options though I couldn't seem to get them to download.</p>

<p>But there is a neat text message sign-up so fans can get alerts about specific issues and updates on the campaign.</p>

<p>Over at the site's <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/downloads/#">Downloads</a> page you can get wallpapers too and even some widgets. There are also buddy icons.</p>

<p>Not too shabby. </p>

<p><strong>Tomorrow</strong>: a look at the McCain-Palin site and tech aspects.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jmottl</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T17:25:39-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpc-taps-amazon-for-low-cost.html">
<title>OLPC Taps Amazon for Low Cost Notebook</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpc-taps-amazon-for-low-cost.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The One Laptop Per Child project is looking to mega-online retail giant Amazon to try and pump more sales for its kid-friendly, XO notebook computer. Specifically, Amazon will be the main reseller for OLPC&#8217;s &#8220;Give One, Get One&#8221; program it developed last year, according to <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/090408-olpcs-dual-boot-linux-windows.html">a report </a>. Neither Amazon nor OLPC has anything about Amazon&#8217;s participation at their sites, <del>and I couldn&#8217;t reach anyone at either company for comment</del>. </p>

<p>(<strong>UPDATE:</strong> The One Laptop Per Child folks got back to me, and along with a statement posted by Amazon, offered some new information and corrected a few misconceptions <a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2008/09/olpcs-amazon-notebook-linux-on.html">here</a>.)</p>

<p>The Give One, Get One program is designed to provide a way for generous consumers to help get the notebooks into the hands of kids in poor countries. Essentially, you buy two of the notebooks; one goes to you, the other is donated to a child in a developing country. The report said Amazon will start selling the colorful XO notebooks later this November. </p>

<p>Back in 2006, the founders of the project said the goal was to develop a notebook with easy to use, educational software installed that could <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3596426/Negropontes+100+Notebook.htm">sell for $100 </a>in mass quantities to developing nations. </p>

<p>When the XO came out last year though, OLPC wasn&#8217;t able to get the price quite that low. The OLPC Web site says a donation of $200 will deliver a new XO laptop <a href="http://www.laptopgiving.org/en/give-a-laptop.php">to a child in a developing nation</a>. </p>

<p>It&#8217;s not known what the price on Amazon will be. OLPC has been a somewhat controversial project. The organization charged Intel with trying to undercut its plans overseas, then made peace, agreeing to let the chip giant join the non-profit organization as a board member. But then later the two had a falling out and Intel went back to focusing on its own &#8220;Classmate PC&#8221; line of low cost computers. The XO runs on AMD processors. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>David Needle</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T17:22:19-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-internets-easter.html">
<title>Google Chrome Internets Easter egg</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-internets-easter.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/about.internets.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/about.internets.html','popup','width=985,height=591,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/about.internets-thumb-200x120.gif" alt="about.internets.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="200" height="120" /></a></span> <div>From the "<i>someone was having fun</i>" files:<br /><br />The first Google Chrome Easter Egg has been discovered. Type in about:internets into the omnibox and you'll get your own view of the tubes themselves...<br /><br />I still like Firefox 3's Easter Egg too (type about:robots). <br /><br />On a more serious not, there are a bunch of about: commands in Chrome that (like Firefox) provide additional details for technical users. <br /><br />Among them is the&nbsp; about:histograms, stats, crash, memory and version options. <b>Try </b>'em out for yourself no doubt there are a few other 'goodies' under the hood that have yet to be discovered.<br /></div>]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Sean Kerner</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T15:07:14-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/red-hats-107-million-virtualiz.html">
<title>Red Hat&apos;s $107 million virtualization gambit</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/red-hats-107-million-virtualiz.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="redhat.quamranet.gif" src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/redhat.quamranet.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="216" height="171" /></span> <div>From the '<i>we love Xen - sorta</i>' files:<br /><br />Red Hat is buying KVM vendor Qumranet for $107 million. It's a big move but I'm not surprised and neither should anyone else.<br /><br />I've been following and using the open source virtualization Xen project for years. Red Hat of course has been supporting Xen for years too. <br /><br />But now Red Hat is taking aim at every other virtualization vendor - be it Citrix, VMware or Microsoft - with this buy. The argument is simple: The OS is critical and the OS is what Red Hat is all about. <br /><br /><blockquote><b>"You may not know this
but most virtualization solutions today use components developed by Red Hat for
their critical functions," Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens said on a conference call. "These competitors are highly<span style=""> </span>dependent on Red Hat for feature development
and hardware enablement&nbsp; - no one is better equipped to carry open source
leadership forward."</b><br /></blockquote>It's all about being a bare metal hypervisor - which is what KVM (developed by Qumranet) is all about. Bare metal means it is part of Linux as opposed to running on top of Linux and the promise is that of greater control, speed and security.<br /><br />Red Hat argues that neither Citrix nor VMware can compete at the same level. The only one that can compete is Microsoft, since they too control their own OS. It's an interesting technical argument and one that no doubt Citrix and VMware will retort with public statements and bravado. Stevens however holds the higher technical ground and ultimately the market itself will prove whose message and technology will reign supreme.<br /><br /><i><b>So why am I not surprised?</b></i><br /><br />Well Red Hat always wants to leverage its core assets - namely it's Linux operating system. Red Hat also always wants to be in a leadership role. Ever since Citrix acquired XenSource, I don't think that Red Hat had the control they wanted. But even more fundamentally it's always about being faster and trying to innovate. KVM is innovative and represents a new direction for virtualization.<br /><o:p></o:p></div>]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Sean Kerner</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T09:50:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/google-all-your-webs-are-belon.html">
<title>Google: All your Webs are belong to us</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/google-all-your-webs-are-belon.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-84.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-85.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-86.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-87.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-89.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-90.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-91.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-92.jpg" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/APATRI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-93.jpg" alt="" />Some Chrome users took a close look at the End User License Agreement (EULA) for its new Chrome browser, apparently a closer look than Google's legal department, and did not like what they saw. <br /><br />One section of the EULA gave the company "a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through" the new browser.<br /><br />Concerns about copyright and privacy were raised on numerous Web sites, including a news aggregator called <a href="http://tapthehive.com/discuss/This_Post_Not_Made_In_Chrome_Google_s_EULA_Sucks">Tap the Hive</a>, which was the first to point out the EULA contents. Critics suggested the language would allow Google to use any Web content displayed in Chrome without getting copyright permission.<br /><br />In other words, content created in Chrome would belong to Google, even though Chrome was just the conduit to enter that content. That would include me typing this into Movable Type, as the blogging service is accessed via a browser.<br /><br />However, a Google attorney sent a statement to Tap the Hive and the news site <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html">Ars Technica</a> that it was an honest mistake, the result of copying in an old EULA from other products and using it in Chrome. Google promised to remove the language from that section of the EULA and apply it retroactively to those who downloaded it.<br /><br />Well one problem down, a few others to settle. The security site <a href="http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP010UPFU.html">SecuriTeam</a> has found a serious weakness in Chrome's handling of malicious code. Chrome uses an older version of WebKit, the open-source browser technology also used in Apple's Safari browser, that includes the vulnerability.<br /><br />Chrome has a download progress bar that, when clicked, will execute the file that has just been downloaded. If it's an executable, a window will pop up, warning the user about downloading malicious code. But if it's a Java archive file, a .JAR, it will run it with no warning.<br /><br />Another vulnerability, which has a proof of concept on the site Evil Fingers, makes it possible to craft a specific link to <a href="http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php?tag=mncol;txt">crash the browser</a>. <br /><br />That's why we have beta testing.<br /><br /> ]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Andy Patrizio</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-03T20:30:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-not-at-risk-from.html">
<title>Google Chrome NOT at risk from Carpet Bombing flaw</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/09/google-chrome-not-at-risk-from.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="googlechromologo.jpg" src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/googlechromologo.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="150" height="55" /></span> <div>From the "<i>if you click on a bad link bad things happen</i>" files:<br /><br />I just got contacted by a PR firm that wanted to talk to me about the new Google Chrome carpet bombing flaw. Only problem is, the flaw isn't what I would call a flaw (<i>but that's not stopping other pubs from reporting on this flaw</i>).<br /><br />Long story short is that security researcher Aviv Raff <a href="http://aviv.raffon.net/2008/09/03/GoogleMule.aspx">blogged</a> that Chrome is at risk from the Carpet bombing flaw he <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3754496">first reported on Apple Safari</a>. Raff has posted a Proof of Concept (<i>nice move dude)</i> which looks to my naked eye to prove conclusively that Chrome users don't need to uninstall their shiny new browser.<br /><br />I've posted a screen shot from my own test below. Notice how Raff even has some Google AdSense ads at the top of his exploit page (<i>isn't that a definition of Chutzpah?</i>). <br /><br />Yes the page can trigger a dialog box to open, but notice two important things. First is that the Google Chrome user still actually has to save the file. Secondly the file is clearly identified as an executable (<i>and yes I know file types can be spoofed...</i>).<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/google.carpetbomb.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/google.carpetbomb.html','popup','width=1024,height=736,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/smk/google.carpetbomb-thumb-500x359.gif" alt="google.carpetbomb.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="500" height="359" /></a></span><br />So the flaw - is that if you click on a bad link and then get a pop up window asking you to download something and you actually click '<b>Save</b>' - well you might have a problem.<br /><br />Same can be said for any other web browser or email program though can't it? Click on bad links, save bad stuff and bad things will happen.<br /><br />Yes - it's great that Raff and others are looking at security on Google Chrome and I really do applaud him for trying, he does try to make a real solid case for issues in Chrome.<br /><br />&nbsp;No doubt there are security issues that will be found that will need to be fixed. That said the common sense of safe browsing should still be common practice, regardless of what browser the user is running.<br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Sean Kerner</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-03T16:55:20-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/metallicas-new-album-leaks-but.html">
<title>Metallica&apos;s new album leaks but Lars is not suing mad</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/apatrizio/2008/09/metallicas-new-album-leaks-but.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[For anyone following the rock/metal scene, it's no secret Metallica has been on the outs with its fan base for some time. A string of bad albums and suing fans for downloading its MP3s did wonders to spoil the reputation for a band that had previously been viewed as one of the biggest, most popular and most significant bands to come along in ages.<br /><br />Its new album, "Death Magnetic," is due on September 12, but despite the band's best precautions, it has leaked to the Internet. Search any <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/search/death%20magnetic/0/99/0">BitTorrent</a> site and there it is, in its full 10 song, 70 minute glory.<br /><br />This is hardly uncommon. Every major album release that I've been following for the past few years has leaked a few weeks to a month prior to official release. It usually ends up on IRC and BitTorrent trading posts, and once it gets into those networks, trying to stop the trading would be like holding back the ocean with a bucket.<br /><br />But there will be no lawsuits this time. Drummer Lars Ulrich, who was particularly singled out for fan vilification over the lawsuits against fans and Napster, <a href="http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&amp;newsitemID=103943">told</a> a San Francisco radio DJ "It's 2008 and it's part of how it is these days, so it's fine. We're happy."<br /><br />He should be. The album is getting very good reviews, not just by critics but by fans alike who grabbed a copy. The band needed some positive word of mouth for once.<br /><br />And yes, it is quite good. <br />]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Andy Patrizio</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-03T16:00:05-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/death-knell-for-nebuad.html">
<title>Death knell for NebuAd?</title>
<link>http://blog.internetnews.com/kcorbin/2008/09/death-knell-for-nebuad.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Updated to add NebuAd's response.</em></p>

<p>Scott McNealy famously quipped, "Privacy is dead. Get over it."</p>

<p>Perhaps, then, what we're seeing in the case of NebuAd is privacy taking vengeance from beyond the grave.</p>

<p>The company that tracks people's Web surfing habits from Internet service providers to serve targeted ads has lost its CEO, Bob Dykes, who stepped down today in favor of a position as CFO with payment-services provider Verifone.</p>

<p>NebuAd, which declined to comment on Dykes' departure, has taken a beating this summer, beginning with the announcement by Charter Communications that it was shelving plans to trial NebuAd's service in response to privacy concerns raised by lawmakers.</p>

<p>In congressional hearings, Dykes <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3759681/NebuAd+Grilled+on+the+Hill+Again.htm">repeatedly testified</a> that his company's system didn't collect any personal information and that no one, "not even the government," could discern an individual's identity from the data that NebuAd collected.</p>

<p>Alas, those assurances might not be enough to save the company. In the midst of a PR crisis, NebuAd's clients have been dropping trials of the company's service. Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3765496/Net+Privacy+Could+See+Action+in+Next+Congress.htm">plans to introduce legislation</a> next year that would require NebuAd to retool its tracking mechanism to only collect data about people who have expressly opted in to the system.</p>

<p>In painting NebuAd as a pariah, it's beginning to look like Markey might have accomplished some of his mission before he even got his legislation introduced.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATED:</strong></p>

<p>NebuAd's statement:</p>

<p>"NebuAd's multi-channel advertising platform was designed to increase the value exchange between marketers and media companies through precise audience segmentation. With an initial go-to-market approach focused on the Internet service provider channel, our CEO Bob Dykes helped accelerate NebuAd into that market leveraging our multi-channel platform along with unique technology built specifically for the service provider channel. Servicing Internet service providers remains a priority of NebuAd, and we are enhancing our technologies in that area.</p>

<p>"In addition, however, NebuAd is also broadening its market via more conventional media channels and means. Accordingly, NebuAd's current President, Kira Makagon who has been responsible for NebuAd's advertising systems and media revenue, will assume the role of CEO to drive adoption of the platform across more traditional channels.</p>

<p>"Bob Dykes will continue to hold the position of Chairman of the Board."</p>
]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Kenneth Corbin</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-03T14:07:21-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>